I’m certain not everyone will be able to play still, but the better accessibility options become over time the more players our medium invites. People that couldn’t play the original in 2013 will find that this version is more accommodating – be that in big or small ways unique to them. Having a triple-A developer like Naughty Dog and a publisher like Sony exceed the monumental number of accessibility options in 2020’s The Last Of Us, Part 2 only helps further cement the industry-wide precedent that welcomes as many people into video games as possible. Naughty Dog boasts “60-plus accessibility options” and a new audio description mode, with these additions iterating upon PlayStation’s other major first-party releases which have started to offer an array of comprehensive accessibility options on release.Īccessibility in video games is a good thing, and no argument on earth holds weight against making the games we play approachable by more people. This game's biggest value proposition, without a doubt, are the new accessibility features. Will you be coming back for another go in TLOU? If this was a new version of Dark Souls, I’m sure I’d eat it up, even if I thought it was overpriced. Some may have never played it before, be that because of a lack of accessibility options or access to hardware, whilst others may just want to jump back into one of their favourite games with some improvements. The inherent value of The Last Of Us, Part 1 comes down to each purchaser's differing context. A remake/remaster (I’m honestly not sure what to call it) of a game from 2013, this PS5 title will keep the core gameplay of the original, whilst improving the visuals, animations and AI, and add new DualSense capabilities, accessibility features and a slew of bonuses. For video games, this means debates constantly encircle the topics of price opposed to content and the need versus greed of rereleasing older games on newer hardware.Ī prime example of these debates comes with this September's The Last Of Us, Part 1. Everyone’s definition of value is different.
0 kommentar(er)
